"Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost." -Thomas Jefferson Liberty Bell :: January :: 2006

January 31, 2006

Coretta Scott King Dies

Filed under: Uncategorized, News, King

The wife of Martin Luther King Jr. died late on Monday. At 78, Coretta had spent her life actively striving for justice and human dignity.

After Martin Luther King’s assassination, Coretta turned her life to preserve Dr. King’s legacy. The founding President, Chair, and Chief Executive Officer of The King Center, she is responsible for the first institute honoring Dr. King. Mrs. King also is resposible for the campaign that established Martin Luther King’s birthday as a National Holiday.

She is the first woman to deliver the class day address at Harvard, and the first woman to preach at a statutory service at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London.

Mrs. King has received honorary doctorates from over 60 colleges and universities, has authored three books and a nationally-syndicated column. She served on and helped found dozens of organizations including the Black Leadership Forum, the National Black Coalition for Voter Participation, and the Black Leadership Roundtable.

She met with many of the great leaders of the world, including the late Pope John Paul, the Dalai Lama, and Nelson Mandela.

Mrs. King, the world thanks you for your work.

You are missed.

January 24, 2006

Apology

Filed under: Me, Myself, and I

I apologize, our family’s internet connection is having problems. With the problems with the net and also the competition I’m preparing for I haven’t had much time to spend on the Liberty Bell.

I will try to keep things updated as best as I can. The competition is not until March 4th, so I will be busy for a while.

January 22, 2006

Music Opinions

Well, I’m in my room on my computer, in case you couldn’t tell! This time though, there’s a reason beyond being bored, or annoyed - wait, shouldn’t speak so soon. Because the cause of this self-exile was a result of an annoying substance - country music. Which happens to be playing fairly loudly in the living room right now.

So it’s not the most common annoyment factor. Who cares if nearly all my friends love the stuff. Country music should be confined to asylums or used to torment people, i.e., used on people already crazy, or on those you are trying to drive crazy. At least it drives me crazy!

There’s a phrase that goes something like ‘hear it once, you’ve heard it all.’ That phrase seems especially true of country music. The lyrics seem to focus on the dog, the truck, or the wife. Or the loss of the said above.

Still, it’s just my opinion. I would never kill, or even ‘dump,’ friends who love country music. I will abandon them when it’s playing. But as long as it’s not in my home, or on the soccer field, everything’s fine.

I am worried about my brother’s girlfriend. She likes country music and his hair… *shiver*

Btw, I’m a classic rock, hard rock, heavy metal person. Eagles, Aerosmith, Metallica, Queen, Guns n Roses… that’s music!! Yes, I might be crazy - but I don’t mind admitting it.

January 21, 2006

View on War

Filed under: Opinions

These are the results from a poll I made to get an idea of what people think about war. I will be leaving the link up - intitled “View on War” - and people are able to vote indefinitely.

Results

What is your age?
10-20 years old (55%)
20-40 years old (33%)
40-80 years old (10%)
80+ no lying! (0%)

56 total votes

Do you believe war is wrong?

Depends (37%)
Always wrong, but unavoidable (30%)
Yes (20%)
No (11%)

62 total votes

Have you served in the military?
No (92%)
Yes (8%)

57 total votes

Would you be willing to?
No (28%)
I would serve for my country if I had to (25%)
Yes (20%)
No, I believe violence is wrong, and would not participate in anything that involves such (14%)
Eww… military?! (7%)
I’m planning on enlisting as soon as I’m old enough (4%)

70 total votes

Do you think war solves things?
Yes (36%)
No (26%)
Other (19%)
Maybe, I’d say it was luck though (17%)

57 total votes

January 16, 2006

Martin Luther King Jr. Day

Filed under: Uncategorized, Quotes, King

January 14, 2006

Order

This is the paper I talked about. It’s a short paper telling why I believe Order is the most important of Franklin’s virtues. Any comments are deeply appreciated.

If you want the list of virtues, I posted them a few days ago.

Order

Order is one of Benjamin Franklin’s thirteen virtues. Benjamin Franklin described Order as, “Let all your things have their place. Let each part of your business have it’s time.” I believe Order is the most important of Franklin’s virtues.

Order is a crucial aspect of how we live our lives. Some people are known for being ‘orderly.’ This usually involves schedules, or neat homes where everything can be found – but Order isn’t limited by that. Franklin’s Order reaches into the lives of even the most disorganized on the planet. Even animals understand, or follow unknowingly, a kind of order.

“Let all your things have their place.” This kind of order governs all of life. Creatures recognize there is “a time for everything, and a season for every activity under heaven.” This includes basic habits such as eating and sleeping. Without this ingrained sense of order, life would fall apart.

Still, Franklin wouldn’t have put Order on his list if he felt humans had a perfect handle on life. Although humans have a sense of order, there is room for improvement. Orderly people are generally able to complete more in less time. Order helps eliminate problems with procrastination, being late, loosing things, and unbalanced activities.

I believe Order is the most important virtue because of how it relates to the other virtues. Order affects the results of other virtues. When a person acquires a habit of being orderly, they have more time more to improve other areas in their life, and to enjoy the fruit that they bring.

January 13, 2006

Bloggers=Punks?

There was an interesting article in Huffington Post comparing bloggers to punks. Worth reading. I don’t agree with everything he says, but it’s an interesting comparison - and I don’t have time to write more up today! sorry…

Anarchy in the USA: Are Bloggers the New Punks?

January 12, 2006

“Lethal Gaps in Protection” analysis

Filed under: Opinions, News

Lethal Gaps in Protection,” informs readers of new body armor designs, while urging the readers to help these designs become available for those in the U.S. military. It is based on a New York Times story, where it was revealed that 80% of the Marines killed in Iraq from wounds in their upper torso might have survived if wearing the new body armor. “Lethal Gaps in Protection,” primarily targets the readers’ emotions – with enough factual statements to form a semblance of credibility.

It starts with a ‘secret Pentagon report’ revealing the news the editorial is based on. After capturing the attention of the readers, the problems with the current body armor are displayed. Or are they? The editorial never goes into detail over what the problems with the current body armor are. Instead, the story is used to point out problems with the Pentagon.

The author of “Lethal Gaps of Protection” seems to be more concerned about “Lethal Government Awareness.” While details regarding the body armor are few, the details against the government are many. It blames a government who refused the protection available since 2003. A nation which isn’t willing to spend any of its $441 billion defense budget on the extra protection. In case you were wondering, the government has known of the problem “since the war began, along with… ”

“Lethal Gaps of Protection” is so well-written in one sense, that you don’t notice how poor it really is. The emotional argument is effective. By using extensive, extreme adjectives, the readers’ focus is drawn to the ‘poor soldiers’ and ‘horrid government.’ But the factual argument is less satisfying. The stated case is extremely vague: “80% of the Marines killed in Iraq from wounds in their upper torso might have survived.” The ‘facts’ against the Pentagon are buttered up with adjectives, making it hard to tell fact from fiction. And anyone looking for plain facts has no reference to look them up in.

Please note I am not disregarding the safety of those in the military.

January 11, 2006

Benjamin Franklin’s Virtues

I have to write a paper on one of Ben Franklin’s virtues. Yay… Although I’m not thrilled about the paper, the actual virtues are interesting, so I included them.

If the paper turns out, I might post it.

1. TEMPERANCE. Eat not to dullness; drink not to elevation.
2. SILENCE. Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself; avoid trifling conversation.
3. ORDER. Let all your things have their places; let each part of your business have its time.
4. RESOLUTION. Resolve to perform what you ought; perform without fail what you resolve.
5. FRUGALITY. Make no expense but to do good to others or yourself; i.e., waste nothing.
6. INDUSTRY. Lose no time; be always employ’d in something useful; cut off all unnecessary actions.
7. SINCERITY. Use no hurtful deceit; think innocently and justly, and, if you speak, speak accordingly.
8. JUSTICE. Wrong none by doing injuries, or omitting the benefits that are your duty.
9. MODERATION. Avoid extreams; forbear resenting injuries so much as you think they deserve.
10. CLEANLINESS. Tolerate no uncleanliness in body, cloaths, or habitation.
11.TRANQUILLITY. Be not disturbed at trifles, or at accidents common or unavoidable.
12. CHASTITY. Rarely use venery but for health or offspring, never to dulness, weakness, or the injury of your own or another’s peace or reputation.
13. HUMILITY. Imitate Jesus and Socrates.

It’s interesting to note why Franklin lists the virtues in the order he does. Quote from The Autobiography and Other Writings by Benjamin Franklin:

My intention being to acquire the habitude of all these virtues, I judg’d it would be well not to distract my attention by attempting the whole at once, but to fix it on one of them at a time; and, when I should be master of that, then to proceed to another, and so on, till I should have gone thro’ the thirteen; and, as the previous acquisition of some might facilitate the acquisition of certain others, I arrang’d them with that view, as they stand above. Temperance first, as it tends to procure that coolness and clearness of head, which is so necessary where constant vigilance was to be kept up, and guard maintained against the unremitting attraction of ancient habits, and the force of perpetual temptations. This being acquir’d and establish’d, Silence would be more easy; and my desire being to gain knowledge at the same time that I improv’d in virtue, and considering that in conversation it was obtain’d rather by the use of the ears than of the tongue, and therefore wishing to break a habit I was getting into of prattling, punning, and joking, which only made me acceptable to trifling company, I gave Silence the second place. This and the next, Order, I expected would allow me more time for attending to my project and my studies. Resolution, once become habitual, would keep me firm in my endeavors to obtain all the subsequent virtues; Frugality and Industry freeing me from my remaining debt, and producing affluence and independence, would make more easy the practice of Sincerity and Justice, etc., etc.

January 10, 2006

Seven Wonders

Filed under: News, Current Events

The Seven Wonders of the Ancient World have been admired for years, but some people think them a bit… old. The New 7 Wonders Campaign has organized a global vote to decide the new seven wonders of the world. The 21 candidates left include the Colosseum, Great Wall, Pyramids of Giza, Statue of Liberty, and the Sydney Opera House.

On January 1, 2007, the results will be announced on a live, worldwide, telecast.

Vote for the new 7 world wonders